Pride and Prejudice
I strongly
feel as if the story of Pride and Prejudice is a strong representation of women
in this period of time and can even extend to the modern day in some aspects.
It gives many different types of women in one story line. A woman who gives up
everything to be with a man and is even willing to disgrace her family because
of it. This girl is obviously Lydia who ran away to marry a man whom is known
by the reader as sort of a bad person. Lydia’s love for the soldiers shows how
different she is than most women in this period and even in that sort of family
class because she is willing to break the norm to marry a man. We get a woman,
Jane, who is thought of as the prettiest and most likely to get married in
their family. She is ready and willing to accept Bingley’s proposal of marriage.
Jane is the most normal of women for this period and this needed to be shown to
compare to her other sisters. Then we get Elizabeth who is seems to be the
strongest and most independent of the women. She turns down Darcy’s marriage
proposal because she sees him as somewhat of a jerk for getting Bingley away
from her sister. Elizabeth is very outspoken and has a better idea of who she
is as a woman. She wouldn’t rush into something unless it is completely true to
herself. Even though she seems more independent, she still falls for Darcy and
marries him like other women in this time would. I feel like Jane Austen’s
portrayal of women is a bit slanted towards individuality in women but still
pushes for the fact regarding women as sort of the same. Women in this time
were pushed to marriage as their only option in life. It’s something they sort
of have to do depending of their situation. The story ends with the sisters marrying
away like any woman was thought to do in this period of time. I feel as if the
story of Bridget Jones gives a great representation of Elizabeth in the modern
day. She is a woman who is strong and desires to be successful yet still wants
to find the man of her dreams. She falls head over heals for Darcy and, and
after finding out that he may not be the man she thought he was, goes on to
make something for herself job wise and even in enhancing her physical and
mental self through fitness and work. This version really shows Elizabeth as someone who wants to be accomplished and ends up doing it. She acquires a name for herself. I feel as if this portrayal of Pride and Prejudice is the best in regards to feminism and pushes for women to be their own individuals and a life outside of marriage. Austen’s portrayal of women doesn’t
really argue to change the system.” It begins with the same old idea of
marriage as a necessity and something all woman really have to do and even
simply want to do, then we get Elizabeth and we see a strong individual woman
whom gives up chooses against someone’s proposal because of respect for her
sister and even for herself, but then ultimately, Elizabeth ends up falling in
love and marrying like any other woman in this period of time. I feel like if
the story ended with a woman who completely does something unladylike in this
time period such as not getting married at all to Darcy, that would be a stance
against marriage and the story would be more of a push to change the system.
The world would then see that women could sort of be okay without marriage. The story of Pride and Prejudice, even though it does follow the normal path of women in this period, it does argue against marriage for reasons other than love. All the interpretations since have really accentuated this belief with Bridgett Jones, I believe, as the most poignant example.
I also really like that the novel portrayed an array of ideas with each woman: the "typical" woman who performs the duty of marriage for money, the woman who refuses to do so, and the woman who runs away to marry the man she loves. I wrote about Jane Austen and the idea of her being a feminist, and I agreed that she does not try to change the system, she simply explains the complexities of it. While Elizabeth's ideas of marriage differ from her sister, Jane's, they ultimately both live out the same fate-marriage. In another class of mine, we are writing essays based on films, and this reminds me of the trend in Disney movies. As time goes on, they seem to be slightly more progressive (women of minorities as princesses, women as ambitious and brave, etc.) yet they still conform to the gender roles and expectations of the time. The novel may seem progressive in the sense that it presents different ideas about marriage, but ultimately still affirms the conservative views at the time due to Elizabeth and Darcy's eventual marriage.
ReplyDeleteI also wrote about Bridget Jones' Diary. The fact that this is a modern adaptation allows for much more progressive views, but I believe she also ultimately fills the role of the typical, conservative woman. Even though she spends time away from Darcy, she still wants someone, and while away from him, she spends time enhancing herself in ways typically seen to be for men's enjoyment-enhancing her physical appearance, for example.
I believe Austen attempted to be progressive, but-perhaps due to fear-could not. The time period would not allow for a woman to totally disagree with the idea of marriage, or to change the system completely. Her book would have been banned, burned, labeled obscene, and all the other ridiculous stuff they did back then.